Cytotoxic chemotherapy is associated with decreased bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with early and locally advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The burden and mechanisms of endocrine therapy-related bone loss have been studied in detail. However, there is limited data regarding cytotoxic chemotherapy's impact on bone health. There are no definitive guidelines for bone mineral density (BMD) monitoring and treatment with bone-modifying agents during cytotoxic chemotherapy. The study's primary objective was to evaluate the changes in BMD and fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) scores among breast cancer women on cytotoxic chemotherapy. METHODS: One hundred and nine newly diagnosed early and locally advanced postmenopausal breast cancer patients planned for anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy were recruited prospectively during the study period from July 2018 to December 2021. BMD of the lumbar spine, the femoral neck, and the total hip were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan. BMD and FRAX scores were evaluated at baseline, end of chemotherapy, and 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The median age of the study population was 53 (45-65) years. Early and locally advanced breast cancers were seen in 34 (31.2%) and 75 (68.8%) patients, respectively. The duration of follow-up between two BMD measurements was 6 months. The percentage of decrease in BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip were - 2.36 ± 2.90, - 2.63 ± 3.79, and - 2.08 ± 2.80, respectively (P-value = 0.0001). The median risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) at 10 years (FRAX score) increased from 1.7 (1.4) to 2.7% (2.4) (P-value = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This prospective study in postmenopausal breast cancer women shows a significant association of cytotoxic chemotherapy with the worsening of bone health in terms of BMD and FRAX score.

An Audit of Delays in the Management of Non-Metastatic Osteosarcoma at a Tertiary Care Center in South India.

Background and objective Delays in the management of osteosarcoma (OGS) lead to tumor progression and the development of metastasis, resulting in a decrease in overall survival (OS). The primary objective of this study was to determine whether delays occur in implementing the individual steps in the management of OGS in South India. Methods In this study, core biopsy reports between October 2019 and October 2021 were retrospectively examined for a diagnosis of OGS. The primary outcome variables in this study were time to MRI, time to biopsy, time to biopsy report, time to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), time to surgery, and time to adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Statistical analysis was performed by comparing the outcome variables with the hypothesized mean. Results There were 38 patients with primary non-metastatic OGS. Of these, 92% received NACT, and 74% completed full treatment. The mean time to MRI was 11.3 ± 6.7 days, mean time to NACT was 15.3 ± 12.7 days, mean time to surgery was 31.1 ± 15.3 days, and mean time to ACT was 29.7 ± 10.1 days. Time to MRI was more than seven days in 68% of the cases, while time to NACT was more than seven days in 74%. Time to surgery was more than 21 days in 83% of the cases, and time to ACT was more than 21 days in 82% of the cases. Conclusion Based on our findings, there is a significant delay (p<0.05) in time to MRI, time to NACT, time to surgery, and time to ACT. The delay in time to surgery is more than the delay in time to MRI, time to NACT, and time to ACT. The delay is due to a variety of reasons, the most common being the long waiting period at the hospital.

Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) have limited therapeutic options and poor survival. There is a need for the development of newer therapies. Sodium valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models of PROC. Synergism with conventional cytotoxic agents like etoposide has been demonstrated. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study, we included patients ≥ 18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed PROC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0-3. Patients received oral VPA 60 mg/kg/day in three divided doses for 3 days (D1-D3), followed by oral etoposide 50 mg once daily for two consecutive weeks (D4-D17). Serum samples were collected to assess peak VPA drug levels. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. We sought to show an improvement in response rate from 25% (historically with oral etoposide) to 40% with the addition of VPA. 27 patients were enrolled in the study, and 18 [median age: 52 (45-59) years; serous histology:17 (94%); ECOG-PS 2 or 3: 14 (78%)] were evaluable for the response after 4 months. Nine patients were lost from follow-up before achieving the primary endpoint (mainly due to Covid-related lockdown issues). The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2 (1-3). ORR was 0% according to GCIG criteria. The disease was stable in two patients [clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 11%]. The median OS and PFS were 7 months and 2 months, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 6 (33%) patients. The addition of valproic acid to oral etoposide in patients with PROC and poor general condition was not helpful and failed to improve responses compared to those historically achieved with single-agent etoposide. However, further phase 2 randomized controlled trials with larger sample size can be done to confirm the findings.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on access to treatment for children with cancer in India and treating center practices.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led the Indian government to announce a nationwide lockdown on March 23, 2020. This study aimed to explore the impact of the pandemic on the accessibility of care for children with cancer and to view strategies adopted by hospitals for service delivery. METHODS: Weekly average of childhood cancer (≤18 years) patient registrations during pre-lockdown period (January 1 to March 23, 2020) were compared with post-lockdown period (March 24 to May 31, 2020). The effect on the scheduled treatment was investigated for post-lockdown period. A survey of health care providers was conducted to determine centers' adopted strategies. RESULTS: In 30 participating centers, 1146 patients with childhood cancer (797 pre-lockdown period and 349 post-lockdown period) were registered. The weekly average registration was 67.3 and 35.5 patients during pre-lockdown and post-lockdown respectively (decline of 47.9%). Although most centers experienced this decline, there were 4 that saw an increase in patient registrations. The distribution of patients registered post-lockdown was found significantly different by age (lesser older age, P = .010) and distance (lesser travel distance, P = .001). 36.1% of patients, who were scheduled for any of the treatment modalities (chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) during the post-lockdown period, experienced delays. Centers adopted several strategies including modifications to treatment protocols, increased use of growth factors, and increased support from social organizations. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study from India suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown impacted 2 out of 3 children with cancer. The effect of this on survival is yet to be established.

The "collateral damage" of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer.

The covid-19 pandemic has impacted the management of non-covid-19 illnesses. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) requires long-duration multidisciplinary treatment. Teleconsultation and shared care are suggested solutions to mitigate the consequences of the pandemic. However, these may be challenging to implement among patients who come from the lower economic strata. We report the disastrous impact of the pandemic on the care of EOC by comparing patients who were treated during the pandemic with those treated in the previous year. We collected the following data from newly diagnosed patients with EOC: time from diagnosis to treatment, time for completion of planned chemotherapy, and proportion of patients completing various components of therapy (surgery and chemotherapy). Patients treated between January 2019 and September 2019 (Group 1: Pre-covid) were compared with those treated between January 2020 and December 2020 (Group 2: During covid pandemic). A total of 82 patients were registered [Group 1: 43(51%) Group 2: 39(49)]. The median time from diagnosis to start of treatment was longer in group 2 when compared to group 1 [31(23-58) days versus 17(11-30) days (p = 0.03)]. The proportion of patients who had surgery in group 2 was lower in comparison to group 1 [33(77%) versus 21(54%) (p = 0.02)]. Proportion of patients who underwent neoadjuvant (NACT) and surgery were fewer in group 2 in comparison to group 1 [9(33%) versus 18(64%) p = 0.002]. Among patients planned for adjuvant chemotherapy, the median time from diagnosis to treatment was longer in group 2 [28(17-45) days, group 1 versus 49(26-78) days, group 2 (p = 0.04)]. The treatment of patients with EOC was adversely impacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a compromise in the proportion of patients completing planned therapy. Even among those who completed the treatment, there were considerable delays when compared with the pre-covid period. The impact of these compromises on the outcomes will be known with longer follow-up.